No. 89·中文精读

1亿英里跑了16年,第2个1亿只用了6个月:Waymo多尔戈夫的20年自动驾驶复盘

Waymo's Dmitri Dolgov: 20 Million Rides and the Road to Full Autonomy

Waymo 联合 CEO Dmitri Dolgov 谈从 DARPA 挑战赛到十一城无人服务的二十年,以及安全底线。

节目音频00:00 / 27:15
中文精读由 AI 基于原始访谈改写,非官方翻译,可能存在偏差或错误;表述以原节目为准。

先看一组数字。Waymo的全无人驾驶里程,第一个1亿英里,跑了大约16年;第二个1亿英里,只用了6个月。

订单曲线同样陡峭。到这期节目播出时,Waymo累计完成超过2000万次全无人驾驶订单,其中1000万次发生在最近7个月。眼下每周全无人里程超过400万英里,服务11个城市,伦敦和东京的开通计划也已经官宣。

坐在红杉资本播客Training Data对面的,是Waymo联合CEO德米特里·多尔戈夫(Dmitri Dolgov)。主持人开场先做了个现场调查:坐过Waymo的举手,一大片;觉得体验好的举手,还是一大片,有人喊“我现在是日活用户”。主持人补了句“厨师得吃自己做的菜”,多尔戈夫答:“我吃了很多。”

介绍嘉宾时主持人给了个参照系:不少创始人的AI资历要从2022年算起,这位在自动驾驶这行干了快20年,从DARPA挑战赛年代一路穿越到今天,牛市熊市都赶上了。他评价多尔戈夫造出了地球上独一份的东西,听着像客套,看完数据会觉得是陈述。多尔戈夫自己就是重度用户,当天坐Waymo从帕洛阿尔托走高速到的旧金山。

多尔戈夫的人生路线也够曲折:苏联出生,在日本住过一年,美国读高中,然后回莫斯科念大学,选了父母读过的同一所学校,莫斯科物理技术学院,学数学和物理。他从小听父母讲那所学校的故事长大,回去读书算是还愿。他后来说,那段经历给了他两样东西:扎实的技术底子,以及独立学习、自己探索的能力。

真正让他下定决心的,是读博快结束时撞上的DARPA自动驾驶挑战赛,先是大奖赛,然后是城市挑战赛,他参加的是后者。他的原话是“开关被按下的时刻”:技术足够有趣,使命足够大,而且是个真产品,能亲手做、亲身体验。从那以后,他再没换过赛道。

这场25分钟的对话信息密度很高:怎么定早期目标,怎么穿越寒冬,端到端架构怎么设计,安全文化怎么养成。下面按话题拆开讲。

十几个人,18个月,10条100英里

2009年项目启动,当时还叫Google自动驾驶汽车项目,根子在斯坦福的实验室。主持人插了个自嘲的细节:当年那栋楼里,一边做自动驾驶,一边做太阳能车,他选了太阳能车,赌错了。多尔戈夫赌的是自动驾驶。

头两年的核心任务就一件事:搞清楚把无人车放上公共道路,到底意味着什么。为了逼自己把问题摸透,团队定了两个硬指标。第一,全自动驾驶累计跑满10万英里,这个数字在当时闻所未闻。第二,在湾区选10条路线,散布各地,全是奔着难度去的,每条100英里,从头到尾全自动驾驶跑完,方向盘后坐着安全员,但全程零接管。

团队多大?十几个人。干了多久?18个月。

主持人感慨,这组数字当年听着像天方夜谭,如今Waymo跑的是几亿英里的量级。

主持人事先还做了功课:团队里流传着多尔戈夫玩命干活、睡办公室的名声。他自己倒不觉得苦,说那是职业生涯里最好玩的日子。白天装硬件、标定传感器、调位姿估计系统、写驱动车辆的算法,顺手把工具、界面、车内体验全包了,晚上出去跑测试。他管那段时间叫Project Chauffeur时期,学习速度和进展速度都快得离谱。正是这两年让他们确信这事值得押上全部,开始朝全无人产品发力。

这段历史里有个细节值得创业者记下来:目标要定成可判定的形式。10条路线、零接管,跑完没跑完一眼可见,没有解释空间。模糊的愿景,靠这种硬指标变成进度条。

寒冬生存指南:突破只改变前半段曲线

2016、2017年,自动驾驶站上炒作周期的顶点,入场公司一大把。然后是集体滑铁卢,多数公司死掉、放弃或者散伙。主持人问多尔戈夫,你们怎么熬过来的。

他先拆了周期的成因,这样的周期他见过好几轮了。自动驾驶这个问题有个特性:起步极其容易,走到真正的产品、走到超越人类的安全水平,极其困难。跟人学车一个道理,几节课就能把车开动,几十年不出事故是另一回事。所以每次技术出现大突破,卷积网络也好,Transformer也好,大语言模型也好,都会带火一波,因为突破重塑的是问题前半段的曲线。长尾部分,一点没变。

一波接一波的公司在前半段跑得飞快,然后在长尾上撞墙。Waymo的选择,是承认问题的难度,同时认准它的分量。分量有多重?他给了一个数字:今天,全世界每26秒就有一个人死于道路交通事故,一年加起来119万人。

知道使命足够重要,同时清楚自己面对的是什么,不去找轻松的赢法、速效方案和银弹,团队才有跑完全程的耐力。

主持人总结得很到位:很多人在低谷里放弃、失败、散伙,Waymo不仅熬过去了,还熬到了另一边,把体验做成全场举手的那种魔法。

这段话眼下就能用上:判断一个赛道值不值得长期投入,先估它的长尾有多长。容易的部分人人会做,难的部分才决定谁留在牌桌上。

端到端,然后呢

聊到技术,多尔戈夫搬出了Waymo的底牌:Waymo Foundation Model,基座模型。它驱动三大支柱:司机(driver)、模拟器(simulator)、评判器(critic),三个任务高度相关又彼此独立。司机负责开车,模拟器造出可控的虚拟世界来训练和评估,评判器给表现打分。

这两年大家张口闭口世界模型、世界动作模型、全模态模型、视觉语言动作模型,多尔戈夫的看法很务实:每个词的核心,都有一种成分对Waymo真正重要。他们的基座模型,他称之为多模态的世界动作语言模型。

多模态,指除了图像和视频,还要吃进激光雷达和毫米波雷达的数据;世界动作模型,指它得真正理解三维空间的物理和动力学,理解车辆、行人、骑行者的行为;对齐语言,是为了把视觉语言模型里的通用世界知识接进来,帮系统读懂驾驶里的语义和社交规则。

还有一层容易被忽略:Waymo建模这个世界,同时自己就是其中的主动参与者。这个世界模型必须可控,系统还得理解什么才算一个好司机,自己的动作会在世界里引发什么连锁反应,也得算清楚。

有意思的地方来了。外界常把Waymo当成模块化架构的代表,把“端到端”留给新玩家。多尔戈夫直接纠正:Waymo的基座模型本身就是端到端的,从传感器一路到决策。端到端的好处很实在,系统各组件之间的表征是学出来的,比人工设计的接口丰富得多,驾驶这种任务靠手工设计接口根本不够用。

但他认为“端到端还是模块化”是个伪二分法,真正的问题是他这句话:

端到端,然后呢?

想做一个全无人、安全性超越人类、要跑几亿英里的产品,光靠一个“原味”端到端系统不够。Waymo的做法,是在学到的表征之外,再叠加一层结构化的、显式的中间表示。

这层东西带来几样关键能力:对跑在车上的模型做运行时额外校验;更丰富的训练和评估配方,包括闭环评估、闭环训练、强化学习用的丰富奖励函数;还有承接乘客和客服反馈的通道。闭环的价值好理解:极端场景可以在模拟里反复练,模型不用等真实世界用事故来教它。主持人补了一句,没有这种架构,这些人类反馈根本接不住,多尔戈夫点头。

他补了个清醒的限定:如果你做的是辅助驾驶、原型demo或者小规模部署,这些可能真不需要。规模和安全等级,决定架构答案。

他还提到,这套基座模型已经做了好几年,真正难的是产品化:上面说的每一个维度,性能、精度、真实度,都得拉到极高的水准。

一天开4城:第六代“司机”和指数曲线

扩张数据是全场最陡的一段。从开始全无人运营,到第4个城市对公众开放,Waymo用了8年。今年早些时候,他们一天之内开了4个城市。多尔戈夫管这个变化叫“相变”:扩张方式整个换了一套。

城市名单后面还排着一长串,国际化也提上日程,伦敦和东京今年宣布了开通计划。

开新城的流程,他拆得很细:采集数据、刻画当地环境、验证司机模型,再花大力气跟当地社区建立对话,因为这是新产品,赢得当地人的信任是Waymo自己的责任。好消息是,司机模型泛化得越来越好,很多新城的工作量已经收缩到高保真的评估和验证上。

硬件也换代了。第六代Waymo Driver是目前最强的传感器套件,关键词是性能、大幅降本和规模化量产。它装在最新的整车平台极氪RT上,今年早些时候开始全无人运营,目前只对员工开放,年内向所有乘客开放。

多尔戈夫坐上去的第一感受:车外尺寸跟捷豹I-PACE差不多,坐进去像客厅,后排空间巨大,配了新屏幕,车门会在乘客走近时自动滑开。他说自己这辈子跟各代测试车打交道,这种“新的第一次”时刻不多,那次算一个。

生活里的渗透更直观。多尔戈夫的三个孩子已经把Waymo当默认出行方式,偶尔坐一次人开的车,孩子们会纳闷:这是怎么回事?他说现在家里能让孩子喊出声的只有两样东西:小狗,和Waymo。主持人接了句:我现在的感觉也一样。

安全13倍:公交车底下的脚步声

安全数据是这场对话的分量所在。基于超过1.7亿英里全无人驾驶里程的数据,在运营城市里,遇到造成重伤的碰撞事故,Waymo的安全水平达到人类司机的13倍以上。按现在的运营规模折算,等于每8天避免一起严重受伤事故。规模再往上走,这个数字还会变大。多尔戈夫说,每周400多万英里跑下来,这种超越人类的安全表现,每天都能在路上看到。

主持人提到,硅谷信奉快速行动、打破常规,Waymo偏偏在安全上出了名地有耐心。多尔戈夫说,现状不可接受,挑战现状是全公司的共识。

两个案例比数字更有画面。

第一个,一个骑电动滑板车的年轻女孩失控摔倒,正好摔在Waymo前面。系统做出超越人类精度和反应速度的避险动作,转向加刹车,所有人安然无恙。

第二个更神。旧金山,一个路口,公交车横穿后停在那里,挡住了半条路。Waymo的灯变绿,车辆起步,然后开始防御性反应。

它的激光雷达、雷达、摄像头都看不见公交车后面的人,车窗还在反射干扰。但激光雷达从公交车底下扫到了一点稀疏回波,来自行人脚步的移动。就凭这一点信号,系统判断对面有个行人,还预测了他接下来会走出来。果然,行人从车后绕出来,Waymo轻轻绕开,各走各路。多尔戈夫说,这是系统涌现能力给他的惊喜之一:没有靠任何新传感器,现有组合就做到了。他看到回放时的反应是:脑子炸了。

他反复强调一件事:怎么走完前90%,和怎么拿到后面的N个9,是两个完全不同的问题。能力可以很快冲到90%,安全不行,它没有谈判余地,必须从第一天起就长在模型架构、训练评估流程和团队心态里。

明天就能用的几条

有观众问未来五到十年什么样。多尔戈夫的回答没有宏大叙事:团队已经切到执行模式,从对司机和业务做刻意的串行去风险,转向快速的并行全球化商用,接下来就是把司机铺进更多美国城市,然后伦敦,然后东京。一个干了20年的人,答案朴素到只有一串地名。

把这场对话压成行动清单,明天就能用:

  • 把愿景翻译成可判定的里程碑。学2009年那10条100英里路线:数字、边界、通过标准一次定死,团队每天都知道自己走到哪了。
  • 评估赛道先量长尾。技术突破只改善问题前半段,长尾才是成本和护城河所在。入场前问自己:最难的那部分,打算用几年熬?
  • 做AI产品别停在“原味端到端”。demo阶段可以纯端到端,要规模化商用,就得补上运行时校验、闭环评估、结构化中间表示这些“不性感”的工程。
  • 把用户反馈接进架构。Waymo把乘客和客服的反馈当成架构级输入,产品团队可以直接照抄这个思路。
  • 底线从第一天写进架构。安全、隐私、可靠性这类不可妥协项,事后补的代价是指数级的。
  • 扩张节奏分两段。新业务先串行去风险,验证跑通后再切并行复制。Waymo用8年跑通4城,然后一天开4城。

最后留一个数字当收尾:第一个1亿英里用了16年,第2个1亿只用了6个月。曲线拐点到来之前,撑住Waymo的,就是上面这些看起来笨笨的纪律。

文稿来源:Megaphone 音频 + Whisper 转写;机器转写可能有识别错误,人名与数字请以音频为准。
We have an unbelievable treat next. A founder who's touching a ton of lives and who's been at it for a very long time. How many people here have been in a Waymo? Okay, well, that's a relief. The chef eats his own food. I do, I do a lot of it. All right, and how many people love the Waymo experience? Rock on. I'm a daily active now. It's incredible. Excellent. Thank you. We have here the creator, a man who has been at this mission for, get this, founders who've been in AI since 2022, almost 20 years building in the autonomous vehicle challenge. And he has not only been at this, he's been at it in the great times, at the tough times. He's been persistent, and he has created something that is unlike anything else on earth. Truly exceptional. Please join me in welcoming Dimitri Dolgov. Thanks. Great to be here. All right, Dimitri. So we've got about 25 minutes together. The goal is to understand a little bit about you. What makes you tick? What has made you persist since the early days of the DARPA challenge 21 years ago, all the way through Waymo early days to today and the future? Let's start on you, and then we'll get into technology very quickly. Sound good? Sounds good. Okay. So Dimitri, you are known by your team as technically brilliant, incredibly intense, but also very kind and humble. You were born in the Soviet Union, raised in the States, and then chose to go back to one of the most prestigious, intense physics programs on the planet in Moscow. How did those first few years of your life shape you, and how did it shape your character? So my parents went to the same school, so that to a large degree drove my decision to go back and went to high school. I actually traveled around quite a bit. I spent a year in Japan, then went to high school in the States, and came back to college to do math and physics in Russia. So that was the same school that my parents went to, and I kind of really grew up hearing stories about what it is like to be at that place. I really wanted to go back. And I think, you know, in terms of how it shaped me, I think it really set the foundation, you know, technical foundation. And the, you know, in those early days in college, one of the most important thing is acquiring the ability to learn and independently explore. So I think that really helped me in my future career. Now, you did this very intense program at Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, and then you decided to keep going on the AI path. You earned your PhD also in AI. And then you pretty quickly were attracted to autonomous vehicles. In 2005, you were part of the DARPA challenge. Can you tell us about those early days? What drew you to autonomy? That was kind of a light switch moment for me. I, you know, in the early days when I went to college and in grad school, it was more, you know, about just the learning of the fundamentals. And I didn't have a, at all, a clear picture, an idea of what I wanted to do after. Right. And then I think the timing just was just incredibly lucky that this was when I was finishing up grad school, the urban challenges, the grand challenge, and then the urban challenge, the one that I took place in were happening. And it clicked. It was just, the technology is incredibly interesting. The mission is so powerful that nothing else come close. And it's a real product there. You can be hands-on, experience it yourself. So it really checked all the boxes for me. And as you said, there's been 20-some years ago. You know, who's counting? And then I've never looked back. And that's what I've been doing since. Amazing. So Waymo started out of a project at Stanford Automotive Lab. There were two sides of this building. There was the autonomy side, and then there was a solar car side. Fun fact, I was an idealist. I worked on the solar car. I got that bet very wrong. You bet on autonomy. Tell us about the first few years of Waymo, from 2009 to the formative years. So we started in 2009. That was, at the time, the Google self-driving car project. And the first couple of years, it was all about learning the problem space, understanding what it means to try to put an autonomous vehicle on public roads. So when we started in service of those goals of learning, understanding the problem space, we created a couple of goals for ourselves. One was to drive 100,000 miles total in full autonomy, which at the time was not heard of. And the second one was to drive 10 routes. Each one was 100 miles long. They were all over the Bay Area, chosen to be very difficult. And we had to do each one from beginning to end in full autonomy. You're still with a person behind the wheel that can take control. But the challenge was to complete each one without an intervention. So it was a small team of us. It was about a dozen people. It was the early crazy startup days. Everybody working 24-7, writing code and building hardware during the day, doing some testing at night. And it took us about 18 months to complete both of those challenges. Incredible. It seemed impossible at the time. Now you guys are on hundreds of millions of miles. Absolutely. Okay. So early Waymo days, extreme challenge starting to achieve there. Next few years, you have a reputation in your team for grinding really hard. You're sleeping at the office. Tell us about Dimitri in the first few years of Waymo and how you formed your leadership style. I got to say, those early days was probably the most fun I've ever had in my professional life. And it is that momentum and that pace of early startup days, right? When you are making so much progress every hour of every day and you're doing everything, right? You are working on setting up the hardware in the cars and then configuring and calibrating the sensors and your pose estimation system. And then you're writing software during the day and it's everything, right? It's the core of the software, the algorithms that drive the car. It is all of the tools and UIs and the user experience in the car. So you're doing everything. You're learning at an insane rate and you're making progress at an insane rate. So those were the early days of Project Chauffeur. And then in those couple of years, we've convinced ourselves that, yes, this is worth pursuing. So we doubled down and started actually building towards the future of a fully autonomous product. Okay. So exciting first few years, intense, fast-paced, technically really difficult. Now take us to 2016-17 for a moment. This was a period where we actually had a hype cycle in AI. Turns out there's been a few of them. And AV, autonomous vehicle, was at the center of that hype cycle. I mean, I remember just so many companies going after this. And then there was a massive slump. And when most people gave up or failed or fell apart, you guys persisted. And you were a leader in that persistence. For all the builders in this room, how did you navigate through the hard times? So first, a comment on what these cycles kind of look like to me and how I've seen them. And you said there's been many, some in an AV, but more generally. And what often leads to a cycle like this is some rapid, some breakthrough that leads to very rapid progress in the early parts of the problem. And very rapid advancement still in the early part of the problem. And in the AVs, the problem has always had this property that is very easy to get started. But it's very difficult to take all the way to a real product, full autonomy, and superhuman performance. So it's somewhat natural, given those ingredients, that whenever there's been a big breakthrough in technology, whether it's convolutional nets or transformers or large language models, it's led to the cycle. Well, okay, now the problem is going to be, you know, and it kind of reshapes the early part of the curve, but it, you know, doesn't change the long tail of it. So for us, I think it was understanding that it's not going to be an easy problem, but it's a very important one. And having, you know, believing in the mission. I think it's today, worldwide, somebody loses their life to a crash on our roads every 26 seconds. So I guess it's the combination of knowing that the mission is really, really important, and then understanding what you're up against and not looking for kind of easy wins or quick solutions or silver bullets that help the team, you know, have the right stamina to go the distance. Brilliant. Brilliant. So you guys were in this moment where it was really easy to get started. A lot of people got there, but you guys actually persisted and got through to the other side with a truly magical experience. Pretty much every hand in this room went up. A truly magical experience because of that persistence. Let's talk about technology today. A lot of people are talking about world models. You have had all the components of world models for many years. How do you think about a world model, and what is Waymo's version of a world model? Yeah, there are a few things that, a few terms that people use nowadays. People talk about world models, world action models, omni models, you know, visual language action models. And at the core of each, there's an ingredient that is relevant and really important for Waymo and for what we've been building in our AI ecosystem. So at the core of our AI ecosystem is what we call the Waymo Foundation model. And it powers three main pillars of our AI and our tech. It's the driver, the simulator, and the critic. And those are very related but distinct tasks. So at the core of what our foundation model needs to be capable of are things like it needs to understand how the world works. The physics, the dynamics of the physical world. And it needs to understand, you know, what it is to be a good driver. And, you know, how the effects of the actions of that driver or AI agent on other agents in the world. And then we need to instantiate those in the physical agent that we're putting on the roads. So in a way, that foundational model that we've been building over the years is a multimodal world action language model. It's multimodal in that it needs to be able to reason about not just, you know, images or video, but also other sensors like lidars and radars. It is a world action model in that, you know, it really has to have a deep, precise understanding of the 3D spatial properties of the world, the dynamics, the physics, the behavioral aspects of other agents like cars, pedestrians, cyclists, and so forth. And we are not just, you know, passively modeling those worlds. We're an active participant in it. So we not only have to, you know, the world model has to be controllable, but also we need to have a deep understanding of what it means to be a good agent in that world. And finally, it's aligned with language, and that allows us to kind of pull in the general world knowledge of a VLM into our model. That is very, very useful in giving us a boost in understanding the semantics and the deep social aspects of driving. And we've been, you know, working on productionizing that model, you know, for years. And it really, it requires an extremely high degree of performance and accuracy and realism in every aspect of what we just talked about. Brilliant. So with this driver-simulator-critic architecture, there's also been a lot of conversation about end-to-end architectures. Is that the appropriate dichotomy? How do we think about the approach to getting us to extreme performance efficiency, autonomous vehicles that are totally generalizable? That's very clear. You know, the world model that is described, the Waymo Foundation model, is an end-to-end model. So when we talk about an end-to-end model, we typically mean that, you know, it's one model that goes from sensors to decisions or actions. And, you know, there's some very nice properties of such a model. One of the most important ones is that it learns the right rich representations between different components of the system, like the encoder and the decoder, or the perception and the planning part of your system. As opposed to something where that interface is engineered, which is not sufficient for, you know, a task like driving. Now, I do think there's a false dichotomy there. There's, you know, end-to-end or something else. But really, in my mind, it's always been the question of, you know, it's end-to-end, and then, you know, what else? And what else do you need to build if you want to have a product that is fully autonomous, has superhuman level of safety, and you want to deploy at a scale and drive hundreds of millions of miles? And there, it turns out that kind of the basic vanilla, you know, end-to-end system is insufficient, right? So, there's a massive difference between using end-to-end versus purely relying on it. So, at Waymo, we've really gone beyond that kind of basic vanilla end-to-end approach, and we've augmented the learned representation with structured, materialized, intermediate representation. And what that allows us to do are a few very important things that you might not actually need if you are, you know, building a different product, if you are building a driver assist system or, you know, a prototype, a demo, or a small-scale deployment. But, again, those things are absolutely critical if you want to go all the way to a fully autonomous, safe system with superhuman performance. And those are things like having extra validation at runtime of the agent that's running on the car in the physical world. It's things like richer training and evaluation recipes that are very difficult or impractical to do in a pure kind of basic ATN system where this structured, materialized representation gives you a boost in things like closed-loop evaluation, closed-loop training, rich reward functions for reinforcement learning. So, that's been our approach. And all the human feedback that you get from support and drivers dropping in and all of that, it's essential to have this type of architecture to do that. Exactly. Makes perfect sense. So, not only have you innovated on the software stack, but also the hardware stack. There's a sixth generation now of Waymo driver, and you guys have always focused on being the driver. Tell us about the new sixth generation, and what was it like the first time you've interfaced with it? So, the sixth generation is our most advanced hardware suite, ancestor suite yet. The focus there has been on performance, but also on simplification, drastic cost reduction, and high-scale volume production. And this is the driver that's powering our latest vehicle platform. That's the OHI. We, earlier this year, started fully autonomous operations. It's currently only open to employees, but coming to all of the riders later this year. And, you know, I had a chance to take a ride in one as soon as we started running fully autonomous operations. And, you know, I spent a lot of my life in various generations of our cars. Every once in a while, there is kind of a new first moment, and that was definitely it. It's just that the cold car is designed around the rider experience. It is, even though the external footprint of the car is about the same as the eyepiece, but inside you get in, it feels like it's a living room. There's so much space in the back. We have new screens. We have these doors that, you know, slide open and will, you know, open automatically when you approach the car. So, I had a blast, and I can't wait to have this car in our fleet open to everyone. So, you guys are going through a period of incredible scaling. For many years, you were in the lab, R&D purely. It took 16 years-ish to get to 100 million miles, six months-ish to get to 200. Things continue to scale really rapidly. 11 cities now, many, many more on the horizon. Tell us, what is it like to scale a new city? And then tell us about your daily life with Awaymo. How do you use it as a creator? Well, there's a lot. Okay, so exponential scaling. First of all, absolutely. It's been a phase transition for us in how we're scaling. So, to give you a couple of additional data points, it took us eight years from the day when we started our fully autonomous operations to the day when we had our service, our driver, providing rides to the public in four cities. Earlier this year, just a few weeks ago, we launched four cities in one day. We have given over 20 million fully autonomous rides. Ten of those million happened in the last seven months. Amazing. So, that's what exponential scaling looks like. Amazing. Launching new cities, there's operational components show up. You have to collect the data, characterize the environment, validate the driver. A significant part of it is starting the conversation with the local communities because it's a new thing. It's a new product. So, it's on us to earn the trust of the people there. And then, more often than not today, we're seeing that the driver is generalizing incredibly well. And it's just a matter of high fidelity, rigorous evaluation and validation before we deploy the fully autonomous product. And then, you know, we grow from there. And then, the last, what was the last part of the question? Oh, what is it? My daily life. It was a multi-part question, yeah. I mean, Waymo is how I get around nowadays. That's how I got here today. It was, you know, a great ride from Palo Alto up to San Francisco on freeways. My family use it. I have three kids. They love Waymo. They, I think, nowadays, they get annoyed if, on a rare occasion, we have to, you know, be in a car that's driven by, you know, myself or my wife or, you know, another human being. They're like, okay, what's going on there? I feel the same way at this point. They love it. It's been part of their lives. There's, you know, for the entirety of their lives, there's, when we are driving around, there's two things. There's only two things that get cold outs from my kids nowadays. It's doggies and it's Waymo's. Nice. Okay. Probably similar amounts of cognition between those two. Okay. So, let's talk about safety. You know, one of the most meaningful, exciting parts of partnering with Waymo has been the fact that there's 1.19 million people a year on Earth that die in road accidents. It is, this is life or death. You know, not only does it touch everyone in this room, but everybody has some connection who's been impacted by this. You have been about safety from the very beginning. And it's actually pretty hard. You know, in a Silicon Valley where it's move fast and break things and see what happens, you guys have been incredibly patient with safety. Can you tell us about a story that made it very real to you and how you keep that safety culture at Waymo? So, the numbers you mentioned, that's what drives all of us at Waymo. And the status quo is not okay. We've kind of grown this over time, but challenging the status quo is really important to everyone at our company. You are absolutely right that how you go about building a system like this is different from you might do in other areas, in other fields, in other industries, where safety has to be the non-negotiable foundation. And you have to build that into everything that you do from day one. Your model architecture, your training and evaluation recipes, the mindset of the team. It can be very tempting to focus on capability first and get to the 90% very quickly. But how you go about the first 90% is a totally different problem for how you go about getting to your next N9s. So, keeping that in mind and focusing on safety as the non-negotiable fundamental layer from day one is super important. And then, you know, today we're driving more than 4 million miles in full autonomy per week. And you see a lot of events from the field. And today we have the data over 170 million miles, fully autonomous miles, where we see that the Waymo driver is more than 13 times safer than a human driver when it comes to serious injury-causing collisions in the cities where we operate. And you see that sort of superhuman safety behavior manifesting itself on the roads, you know, daily. I see examples of, you know, recently it was a little while ago, there's an example that I saw of a person, I think it was a young woman, on an electric scooter on a road. And then she lost control and tripped and fell right in front of the Waymo. And the Waymo driver showed superhuman accuracy and reaction time. I was able to, you know, swerve and brake and everybody walked away. So it's things like this that, you know, I myself personally and the team, the whole team find very rewarding in terms of actually having a real impact on the safety of our roads. And the scale that we're operating, that 13x reduction means that we are preventing a serious injury every eight days. And that impact will just grow as we scale up. Wow. We're going to open the room to audience questions a couple in just a moment. But before we jump in, I heard a story about the LIDAR detecting or the radar detecting the footsteps of somebody behind a bus. Did that happen? And how does that work? Yeah, this was one of those moments where I was positively surprised by the emerging capability of our system. And the situation was, this was, I think, in San Francisco. The Waymo driver was at an intersection. There was a bus that crossed and we're, you know, sitting there waiting at a red light. So the bus crossed and stopped partially blocking the intersection. So our light intersection. So then our light turned green. The Waymo driver started to proceed. And as it's proceeding, it detects a pedestrian on the other side of the bus. And, you know, you can't see through the bus. It's, you know, not through lighters, not radars, not cameras. You know, the windows are reflecting the people inside the bus. And then, you know, it starts to react defensively. And sure enough, a pedestrian emerges from behind the bus. And then we're able to nudge around them. And everybody, you know, goes on their way. So when I saw that, I was, it blew my mind. I wasn't sure what's going on. I'm, like, as capable as superhuman as the Waymo driver is. It doesn't see through solid objects. So actually what turned out was happening is that our lighter had, was balancing the signal, you know, under the bus. And got a little bit of a sparse return from the movement of the person's feet under the bus. And that was enough for the Waymo AI to not only detect that there's a pedestrian there, but also make a prediction about what's going to happen in the future. And keep everyone safe. Mind-blowing. Pretty unbelievable. We've got time for one question from the group. If anybody has a key, Jim, sorry, no free codes. Not at this one. No. Yes, Jim, please. Thank you. Does this work? Yes. I was just saying congratulations on all you've achieved. It's really mind-blowing. If you think about the next five to ten years, really focus on the business model. What are the milestones? What happens in major cities? What's going to be different than where we are today? Just kind of walk us through your vision of the future. Sure. So we're heads down in execution mode. We've transitioned from intentional sequential de-risking of the driver and key parts of the business to rapid parallel global commercialization. That means deploying the Waymo driver in more places across the United States. And today we're in 11 cities operating fully autonomously and serving our riders. That we're going to expand in those existing places. We're going to add new geographies, new cities. We're also expanding internationally. Announced that this year we'll plan to offer service in London and in Tokyo. So you will see us just accelerating that deployment all in service of our mission. Good news to our team in London. Well, we covered a lot, Dimitri, from the very early days where you could get a lot of distance with not a lot of technology to then persisting through extremely hard times in autonomous vehicles and getting that extra mile. We talked about world models, driver simulator critic architecture. We got into the hardware, the sixth generation hardware, safety and scaling. But most of all, I hope that we learned a little bit more about Dimitri, the man who's brought the magic that is Waymo to so many of us. And as I've gotten to know you more and more, I'm constantly struck not only by your brilliance and your persistence and performance, but also your humility. It says a lot for accomplishing this much. Thank you, Dimitri. Please join me in thanking Dimitri for all he does. Thank you. Thank you. And the many lives saved. Thank you. Thank you.

Dmitri Dolgov, co-CEO of Waymo, joins Sequoia partner Konstantine Buhler at AI Ascent 2026 to talk about the 20-year arc from the DARPA Grand Challenge to fully autonomous service in eleven cities and counting. He explains how Waymo persisted through every AV hype cycle by treating safety as the non-negotiable foundation, why exponential scaling is finally here (10 of Waymo's 20 million autonomous rides have happened in the last seven months), and how the Waymo Foundation Model — a multimodal world action model that powers the driver, the simulator, and the critic — actually works under the hood. Also: why Waymo is now 13x safer than human drivers, and the moment a Waymo detected a pedestrian behind a city bus by reading the LiDAR returns of their feet.

本集资源与出处