No. 13·中文精读

VMware开价25亿美元收购ServiceNow,红杉怎么在圣诞节前把它搅黄了

Crucible Moments Returns for S2: The ServiceNow Story ft. CEO Frank Slootman & Founder Fred Luddy

红杉另一档播客 Crucible Moments 第二季首集,ServiceNow 两位关键人物回顾公司从白手起家到千亿美元市值、再到企业级 AI 规模化的历程。

节目音频00:00 / 42:53
中文精读由 AI 基于原始访谈改写,非官方翻译,可能存在偏差或错误;表述以原节目为准。

圣诞节前的几天,ServiceNow的创始人和CEO都点了头,把公司卖给VMware,作价25亿美元。红杉资本是重要股东,手里却没有投票权,按程序根本拦不住。

红杉合伙人Doug Leone人在夏威夷度假,家人看着他攥着一部翻盖手机,在房间里来回踱了整整七天。他拨通创始人Fred Luddy电话的时候,对方正牵着年幼的儿子在自家旁边的马道上散步,孩子穿着连体睡衣,小手攥着他的小指头。

交易最后没成。几个月后ServiceNow上市,首日涨29%,年底市值37亿美元,比VMware的出价高出10亿。两年后冲到100亿。今天,这家公司市值超过1500亿美元,服务7700多家企业。

这是红杉出品的播客《Crucible Moments》第二季的开篇,主持人是红杉管理合伙人Roelof Botha,讲的是ServiceNow,一家从IT服务台工具长成的工作流平台巨头。嘉宾阵容少见地齐:创始人Fred Luddy,把公司带上市的CEO Frank Slootman,红杉合伙人Doug Leone和Pat Grady,连当年张罗收购的VMware总裁Carl Eschenbach(现任Workday CEO)都请来了,买卖双方各讲各的版本。

从3500万美元到零,50岁再出发

Fred的起点跟典型创业者不沾边。他没读完高中就离家打工,刚拿驾照就在工厂干活。某天,一台裹着透明塑料膜的机器从走廊经过,他鬼使神差地跟了上去,看它进了机房:白色高架地板,穿白大褂的人。那是台HP 2100小型机,有人在上面写工资单和订单录入程序。

他说自己在那一刻找到了毕生的热情,之后再没想离开过机房。

1990年,他当上Peregrine Systems的CTO,这家公司做的是最早的IT服务管理软件。2002年,美国证监会(SEC)查出Peregrine大规模财务造假,公司破产,多名高管因欺诈、挪用公款和欺骗监管入狱。Fred的全部净资产都押在这家公司里,3500万美元一夜归零。

回忆那段日子,他说一半是恐惧,一半是解脱,因为他在那儿干得并不开心。同时他看到地平线上要有一次地壳级的变动:云计算。

2004年,离50岁生日还有两周,他在自家创办了ServiceNow。没有资源,没有销售团队,就开着车在圣地亚哥县挨家敲门,请求人家免费试用,条件是给反馈。Doug Leone后来评价这位创始人:被烧过一次,憋着一口气,有领域积累,愿景清晰。最好的创始人就是这种。

顺风也确实在。一股是云计算本身,另一股叫ITIL,一套给IT运维定章法的流程标准,故障处理、变更管理、升级、安全风险都有通用语言。当时没有一家软件商按这个标准做过产品。Fred自己总结,赶上了完美风暴式的市场空档。

什么都能干的产品,先学会只干一件事

ServiceNow的底层设计很超前:一个低代码、无代码平台,稍微懂点技术就能在上面搭应用,让那些被技术栈吓住的人也能动手。Fred心里的英雄是乔布斯、盖茨、佩奇和布林,人家毛头小子就开干了,他自己50岁才起步,心里也打鼓。

但这个设计差点把公司憋死。Fred打了个比方,这相当于造了一门计算机语言。它能干嘛?什么都能干。能帮我解决什么业务问题?你有什么问题我都能解决。绕一圈回来,客户还是不知道该拿它干什么。

Fred离开Peregrine时发过誓,再也不碰IT服务管理。结果他的“永不”坚持了大约九个月。他把宽泛的平台收窄成一个具体场景:给IT部门做服务台(help desk)替换工具,管报修工单那类事。收费按席位算,但不给席位数设上限,谁想用都能用,产品可以从IT部门自然长到全公司。

这套打法后来被客户用到极致。最出名的是CERN,欧洲的粒子物理实验室。CERN在ServiceNow上搭了4000个小应用,服务四五千种需求,从借教室、领白板、报修漏水马桶,到预约大型强子对撞机做实验。CERN的人来用户大会分享,最震惊的反倒是ServiceNow自己的工程师。

Fred说,让他确信公司能成的一个信号是:客户主动求着帮他打推荐电话,“让我们跟你们的潜在客户聊聊吧”。而他待过的上一家公司,挖一个愿意接电话的参考客户要一个月,因为客户恨透了他们。

红杉进门,只能有一个CEO

2008年,红杉的Pat Grady开始给Fred发邮件,四封里三封石沉大海,第四封收到一句“谢谢,我们不缺钱”,附了几句业务近况。Pat一看那几句话,改了策略,邮件从“要不要通个电话”换成“下周二我在圣地亚哥,一起吃个午饭”。Fred回了,Doug和Pat就真飞过去吃了这顿饭。他们带了10页幻灯片,讲的全是红杉自己犯过的错,以及怎么帮被投公司别再犯。Fred把这几页一直夹在文件夹里。

Doug问Fred,眼下最大的挑战是什么。Fred说,系统快撑不住了,数据中心被流量淹了。Doug给了他一个人。一周后Fred来电:你们帮我的忙,比我现有投资人加起来都多。2009年底,红杉领投了4100万美元的D轮。客户名单里出现了德意志银行、英特尔、麦当劳,收入每年翻倍。

但Doug做了一件他自称这辈子唯一一次的事:建议公司放慢增长。公司正在被自己的成功压垮,客户涌进来的速度超过了团队的消化能力。

另一件事更根本。Doug问Fred:你想当CEO,还是当产品负责人?我们的经验是只能选一个。Fred把这话放在心里“研究”了一番,什么也没干。红杉安排他跑了一整天会面,见各种创始人和高管。晚上吃饭,Fred咧着嘴笑:我想清楚了。我不具备那些CEO的技能,也没兴趣去练。我是产品的人,你们得另找CEO。用Doug的话说,让Fred一个人待在角落机房写代码,他最开心。

找人过程不顺利,Doug有中意的人选,Fred也有,俩人对不上。后来他们听说Greylock的运营合伙人Frank Slootman不想干投资了,在找CEO的活儿。Frank就是后来执掌Snowflake的那位。他的第一反应是怀疑:服务台管理?地球上最无聊的生意。他到处打听,信号互相矛盾,有人说这公司热得发烫,有人说毫无战略价值。最后让他下决心的是三件事:增长快,客户狂热,现金流为正得不像话。他的名言:速度是风险投资的母乳,有速度你才有一切,没速度你什么都没有。

2011年,Frank接任CEO,Fred转任董事长兼首席产品官。磨合期惨烈。Fred说,Frank上任后的头90到120天,是他职业生涯最难的一段,因为他习惯了当仁慈的独裁者,现在那把椅子上有别人了。

Pat讲了个小事。公司在圣地亚哥,湾区新开了办公室,圣地亚哥办公室有本地球队的球票,湾区没有。Frank说,不公平,把票处理掉。几周后他听说有人还是去看了球,把负责这事的人叫来问。那人说,大家都报名了,就让他们用完这个赛季吧。Frank说:好吧,你不用在这儿干了。Pat说,这事看着小,但Frank要全公司听懂一句话:他交代的事是命令,没有商量这一层。

Fred也给Doug打过电话,说自己不确定这步棋走对了。Doug只回了一句:给它90天。后来Fred在邮件里公开反对Frank定的第一优先级,Frank打电话过来:Fred,只能有一个CEO。你可以不让我当,但只能有一个。Fred说,你说得对。从那以后,俩人有分歧就关起门一对一谈。Frank也很清楚自己需要Fred:有远见,能推动事情,知道所有坑埋在哪。用他的原话,“他知道每一具尸体埋在哪儿”。

衣柜里的云,离关门90天

Frank接手的摊子比外面任何人知道的都糟:客户合同条款没法执行,得重签;专利几乎空白,随时可能被官司打穿;各部门都缺人。最吓人的是技术底座。ServiceNow做的是云应用平台,可那个年代云基础设施压根不存在。Fred开玩笑说,创业初期他们在eBay上买了台二手戴尔服务器塞进衣柜,那就是他们的“云”。用今天的话说,相当于一家银行拍胸脯保证资金安全,金库其实是家里的衣柜。

客户是谁呢?通用电气、瑞银、德意志银行。Fred说这套系统的特别之处在于,客户连几分钟的宕机都不能有,永远不能。德意志银行的COO早早撂了话:你们必须成功,我们已经没有退路了。Frank说,他听着这话,脑子里想的是:我们正跑在衣柜里的一台戴尔服务器上。

宕机成了日常。强生的CIO会直接打电话来吼:你们那边到底怎么回事?Frank说,外人看我们就是不知道自己在干嘛,他们没看错,我们确实不知道自己在干嘛。他头一年每天睡前都害怕半夜的电话。

“我不觉得我们能活过这一劫。这事太大了。怎么活下来?没有像样的解释,没有说得通的故事,这就是疯狂。”

解法最后来自工程副总裁Dan McGee:把基础设施同质化,所有人跑完全一样的软件栈,补丁版本、服务级别全部统一。问题像被冻住一样一个个消失,运维从手工业变成了饼干模子。这套架构后来从全行业最差做到最好,毛利率也跟着变得非常好看。

人才问题上,Frank猛踩油门:几个月内把公司人数翻倍,董事会惊了,你们干了什么?公司为此亏损了两个季度,尽管此前利润丰厚。他事后说,回头看,要是能更快我还会更快。

产品定位也升了一级:从服务台替换工具,改成“IT版的企业资源计划(ERP)”。IT部门要有自己的核心记录系统,单一数据库,全功能打通。卖的对象从服务台那几十个人,扩大到整个IT部门的每一个人,同一个客户的可售席位翻了四五十倍。Frank的话是:你要在IT干活,却没有这个系统的账号,那你在这儿干嘛?

Doug后来在董事会晚宴上对Fred说了句后话:感谢上帝我们等来了Frank,因为在我看来,当时我们离关门只有90天。

圣诞节前的阻击战

公司缓过来了,买家自己找上门。先是戴尔,然后是VMware。那两年的VMware如日中天,Fred飞去帕洛阿尔托见了时任总裁兼COO的Carl Eschenbach。Carl的算盘很清楚:ServiceNow是好平台,但他们知道这家公司的技术和架构正挣扎,VMware有全世界最好的工程师,可以帮它现代化、稳住、扩容。这也解释了25亿这个价。

按Fred自己的说法,那年他55岁上下,破产过两次,孩子刚出生不久。这至少是个“不再破产”的机会。Frank也在摇摆,公司正处在最艰难的阶段,他最怕把这事搞砸,留下一地火车残骸。Frank给Doug打电话时说得很直白:当年几十亿美元量级的退出极其罕见,这种事你没法直接无视。你们VC是撒网投很多家,我们只有这一家。

红杉这边手里没牌。按Doug的说法,他们从Fred手里接的是普通股,没有投票权,在董事会也说不上有分量的话,意见讲完就完了。Pat后来管VMware这招叫“假期偷袭”,专挑圣诞节董事会凑不齐的时候出手。他本人当时在新西兰,跟当时的女友、现在的妻子走一条三天不通信号的徒步线。走出山的第一时间,邮箱涌进邮件,Doug的标题全大写:"WHERE ARE YOU PLEASE",正文只有一句:CALL ME。

Doug让团队做了10页幻灯片,论证按25亿卖等于白送,发给Fred和Frank。他当面跟Fred说:Fred,你在被人贱卖。Fred回:如果这叫被贱卖,我可能会喜欢上它。Doug又甩出那句后来应验的话:你会拿到一个“十倍股”(10 Bagger),这公司将来值100亿,现在为什么急着卖?

12月22日前后,Fred牵着儿子在马道上走,Doug的电话打进来:Fred,要不要我们给你开张1亿美元的支票?谁想按这个价卖,我个人全收。表了态,但程序上还是拦不住。

真正的转折是一次法律求助。Doug打电话给律所Wilson Sonsini当时的掌门人Steve Bochner,对方说:董事会负有信义义务,必须为公司寻找最高报价,也就是把公司拿出来公开询价。Doug召开董事会提出这个要求,公司当时的法律顾问回了一句:只有上市公司才需要询价。Doug再打电话,Bochner说不对,私人公司也要。Doug说,那我怎么吵得过他?他说只有上市,我说私人也得,我需要更硬的东西。

接下来是Doug说的“一生一遇的运气”:Bochner提到,律所华盛顿办公室刚好请来一位合伙人,特拉华州衡平法院的前大法官Bill Chandler,私人公司也须询价这条规则,他本人参与写过。12月23日,Doug再开董事会,把Chandler请上电话。对方把法条讲清楚,董事会和律师都哑了。Doug挂了电话,问了一句:那谁去给Larry Ellison打电话?会议室一片安静。他说,那一刻他知道,这桩并购死了。这句话的意思是,询价流程一启动,就得把公司摆上货架,打给甲骨文这样的潜在买家。没人接这个话茬。

Fred嘴上说失望透顶,心里其实知道这才是对的。Carl多年后复盘,说这是Doug和红杉的一记柔道:他们清楚ServiceNow所在的市场有多大。他干了37年,没见过第二回。Doug的原话:这种故事,十个职业生涯碰不上一次。

2012年6月,ServiceNow在纽交所敲钟。Doug的十倍预言两年后兑现,市值100亿。今天,公司市值超过1500亿美元,年收入100亿。Frank进门时公司250人,年销售额不到1亿。Pat的评价是:没有任何一家软件公司在他们这个体量上,还能跑出这样的数字。

明天就能用的五条

把这一集的干货压缩成五条:

“唯一重要的问题是,这家公司五年后、七年后、十年后能成为什么。你的野心有多大?然后,让它跑。”
  • 判断卖不卖公司,唯一该问的问题是它五年、七年、十年后能变成什么样。这是Doug给所有收到收购要约的人的建议:别被一个看着很大的数字迷住,也别信模型算出来的远期倍数。想清楚野心有多大,然后让它跑。
  • 创始人早做单选题:当CEO,还是当产品负责人。Fred拖了一阵,最后一句“我没有那些技能,也不想练”,反而让公司等来了对的掌舵人,也让自己回到最能创造价值的位置。
  • 产品太通用卖不动时,先收窄到一个具体场景扎进去。ServiceNow先做服务台站稳,再靠平台扩展性长回全公司。先有入口,再有平台。
  • 可靠性问题的解法往往朴素:统一技术栈,消灭特例。所有服务器跑一样的软件、一样的补丁级别,混乱自然退潮。管系统如此,管团队也如此。
  • 换CEO这种手术,成败在两个人各让一步。Frank留住了Fred,Fred给了Frank90天。缺任何一半,都是排异反应。

最后记两句话。Fred谈技术:能活很久的技术,需要极度的简单和极度的模块化。他谈文化:诚实说明自己能做什么,坦白承认短板,犯了错就认账。一个高中都没读完、50岁二次创业、破产过两次的人,把公司做到了1500亿美元。Frank说,有时候听听这样的故事挺好:人世间最深的恐惧熬过去了,回头看,事情真的能成。他的原话是keep the faith,守住信念。Fred的收尾更简单:他等不及看ServiceNow的下一个10年、20年。

文稿来源:sequoiacap.com;机器转写可能有识别错误,人名与数字请以音频为准。
id="podcast-transcript" data-framer-component-type="RichTextContainer" style="transform:none">Frank Slootman: It was much more existential than, oh, you know, we got some tough challenges on our hands. I didn’t think we were going to live through this. This is so huge, so enormous. How do you survive this? Because there are no good explanations. There are no reasonable stories to be told. This is just insanity.  IntroductionRoelof Botha: Welcome to Season 2 of Crucible Moments, a podcast about the critical crossroads and inflection points that shaped some of the world’s most remarkable companies. I’m your host and the Managing Partner of Sequoia Capital, Roelof Botha. Picture the office mailroom of the 1970s. In that mailroom were stacks of typewritten forms. A form for expense reports, a form for vacation days, a form for purchase orders, and so on. A few decades later, a programmer named Fred Luddy was determined to reimagine that workflow system for the internet age and the IT departments tasked with managing it. His low code, no code solution would be able to handle anything from reporting a broken laptop to managing the world’s largest particle physics lab. Today’s episode is about ServiceNow, a cloud application platform for digital workflows. ServiceNow evolved from an IT service tool into a workflow platform that can be used in any department. With this evolution, its market cap has grown to over $150 billion. Difficult questions and hard choices shaped ServiceNow’s journey. How does one rebuild their life after catastrophe, and devise an innovative idea in the process? When do you know it’s time to hand over the role of CEO for the good of your own company? And how do you decide whether to take what seems like a once-in-a-lifetime offer to sell your company, or take a gamble and remain independent? These are the crucible moments that forged ServiceNow. Fred Luddy’s journey to codingFred Luddy: I’m Fred Luddy and I’m the founder of ServiceNow. My journey into coding was really, pretty much an unconventional one. I left home at a very early age, right around the same time I got my driver’s license and started working in a factory. In the office part of the factory, a machine came down the hallway that was wrapped in plastic, in this clear plastic. And I didn’t even know what the machine was, but I followed it, and it went into this room with this white raised floor and people were wearing lab coats. And somehow, I knew that that was the place where I needed to be.   For a couple of weeks or months, I poked around and tried to find out what was going on in that room and found out that it was a computer, an HP 2100 C and that there were people building applications to do things like payroll and order entry. I found the passion of my life at that moment. I never really wanted to leave that room until I went to a bigger computer room. And that holds true today. Founding ServiceNow after financial ruinRoelof Botha: In 1990, Fred became CTO of Peregrine Systems, a company that built some of the first IT service management software. But in 2002, the company faced a major crisis. The SEC would find the company guilty of massive accounting fraud. Peregrine went bankrupt and several of its top executives went to prison for fraud, embezzlement and lying to regulators.  Fred Luddy: I had all of my net worth tied up in this company and my net worth went from 35 million to zero in an instant.  Fred Luddy: I had fear because I wasn’t sure what I was going to do next. But then, there was relief because, fundamentally, I didn’t like working there. The year at this point is 2002, you could see on the horizon that there was going to be just a tectonic shift. Pat Grady: ServiceNow kind of sat at the intersection of two major tailwinds. My name is Pat Grady and I’m a partner at Sequoia.  Tailwind number one was as simple as the cloud transition and the benefits that this new business model provided for software companies. The second was a very specific tailwind, which is this thing called ITIL, or I-T-I-L, which stood for IT Infrastructure Library, and it was basically a language for talking about what was happening in IT.  And it coincided with this broader transition from the heads of IT, the CIOs, being hackers who had sort of gotten promoted up into the role, to being professional business people who were more likely to have an MBA than a CS degree.  Fred Luddy: ITIL defined different processes for running your IT organization. Largely break/fix, change management, upgrades, application development cycles, security, risk, etc.  Nobody, to that point, had built something to this ITIL standard. So, there was no set of applications available. So, we ran into I think a perfect storm, if you will, of market opportunity.  The idea for ServiceNow was that we were going to create a completely extensible, low code, no code platform that would let you build applications with just a tiny amount of technical knowledge. We really wanted to build something that empowered people that had been previously intimidated by technology stacks. But my heroes were Steve Jobs, and Bill Gates, and Page and Brin and they all started right out of puberty, right? And all of a sudden, they’re building these great corporations and I’m thinking, what the heck am I thinking trying to build a company, especially starting it after 50? Doug Leone: Fred was a founder that had been burned before. He had a chip in his shoulder.  I’m Doug Leone, I’m a partner at Sequoia Capital.  He wanted to do something special, one. Two, he had domain expertise. So, he knew what he wanted to build. He had crystal clear vision. Those are the best kinds of founders. Roelof Botha: In 2004, two weeks before his 50th birthday, Fred Luddy launched ServiceNow from his house—with no resources and no sales team to pitch the product. He took to the road, driving up and down San Diego County, looking for prospective customers. Fred Luddy: I asked people, would you please use our software for free? But I’m asking you, in return, to give us, you know, some kind of feedback on how it’s working.  We worked with them on a day in, day out basis because we wanted to make sure that they were properly engaged and actually deriving value from the software. And, this turned out to be a really good way of getting into the market.  Finding product-market fitFred Luddy: So, the evolution of the ServiceNow platform was really inherent in its initial design, which was based on simplicity and approachability. And, this idea turned out to be a fantastic one and a not good at all one at the same time. By not good at all, I mean that we built this platform and it was similar to creating a computer language. What can it do? Well, it can do anything you want. Well, what business problem can you solve for me? Well, what business problem do you have? We’ll solve it for you. So, you go around in this circle because it didn’t solve a specific business need.  Roelof Botha: Almost at the outset, ServiceNow faced a crucible decision: How do you take such a general product to market? Do you stick to your broader vision of a Swiss Army Knife solution or do you frame it as something more specific? Fred Luddy: And so, even though when I left Peregrine, I swore that I would never, ever, ever go back into the IT service management area, it turns out that my definition of never was about nine months. Roelof Botha: Fred took ServiceNow’s broad architecture and refined it into a help desk replacement tool specifically for IT departments.  But Fred also decided on a seat-based licensing structure with no limit on seats. This way, a company could organically begin using the product  across the entire office, not just IT.   Pat Grady: So, the product that he had built was, in his words, just a forms-based workflow on top of a database. The specific workflows that ServiceNow was targeting was the resolution and management of help desk tickets. Doug Leone: You join a company, you get a laptop, you have questions, you want to be integrated to the systems in the corporation… and what you really need is a back and forth forms application to do that. Pat Grady: Somebody submits a helpdesk ticket, you got to figure out if that incident speaks to some sort of underlying issue, you got to resolve the incident while also inspecting the issue and you got to keep going until you get it fixed. That same basic process of managing things through a workflow, that’s the same thing that you would do if you were tracking a candidate through the candidate pipeline. It’s the same thing you might do if you were tracking a prospect through your customer pipeline. It’s the same thing you might do if you were processing an insurance claim.  Fred Luddy: It’s eminently more extensible, eminently more scalable, eminently more secure, and at the same time, it’s more approachable.  Roelof Botha: Using IT as a lever to encourage adoption across the entire organization was a strategy Fred called going wide. Fred Luddy: We had a couple of different customers that were very much leading edge in showing us this ability to go wide. And probably my favorite one is CERN, which is a particle physics laboratory in Europe. They offer 4,000 or 5,000 different services to the visiting people. And it could be anything from getting a classroom, getting a whiteboard, complaining that the toilet is leaking or scheduling time on a Large Haldron Collider to do a particle physics experiment. And CERN built 4,000 of these tiny little applications that serve this entire community, and they came and presented it at our user group meeting. And I think the people that were most blown away were those of us that had built the platform because we thought, my God, this is awesome that they could build these sets of applications. Roelof Botha: Slowly, the company was growing, gaining enterprise customers like Edmunds and Qualcomm.  Fred Luddy: And I would say that the thing that told me that the company was going to do well was the enthusiasm that our customers had to make reference calls. They said, let us talk to your prospects. They actually asked us if they could talk to our prospects. And I had worked in software companies where digging up a reference call could take a month because our customers hated us so much. << laughs>> Fred Luddy: We kept meeting people from the VC community. First of all, they’d come in and assert that they were different. Then, they’d tell us exactly the same story that we heard from the prior person. And then, they would say, well, listen, you guys are doing great. And they said, let’s keep in touch. And then, they’d leave and we looked at each other, my CFO and I, thought, well, I’m not sure we’re getting any value out of these. So when Pat started calling, like, oh, here’s another one of these people from Sand Hill Road. Pat Grady: In 2008, I started emailing Fred.  Three out of four emails went unanswered. And then, the fourth email might’ve been a polite, hey, thanks for thinking of us, but we don’t need any money sort of thing. I think during one of those responses, he said, but let me give you a little update on the business. And the little update on the business was a couple of sentences that basically painted the picture of a business that was thriving. And so, at that point, I transitioned from the, hey, do you want to get on the phone? emails to the, hey, I’ll be in San Diego next Tuesday. Do you want to grab lunch? And of course, if he were to respond, then I would fly to San Diego for lunch. I sent him one of those and he responded, I want to say at 11:30 AM on the Tuesday that I told him I was going to be there and said, yeah, yeah. Do you want to swing by? Are you still open? And I responded immediately and said, ah shoot. My trip got pushed in next week. How about same time next week? And he said, okay, great. So, Doug and I flew there for a lunch on a Tuesday, which was the first time we met Fred in person. When you talked with him, and this is the thing that really stood out, the clarity of thought and the focus on first order issues was impossible to miss. Doug Leone: He was hungry. He worked like mad and he was building a great business. And so, it seemed like something we ought to do without much thinking. Pat Grady: And then, as the conversation progressed, Doug has this magical way of sort of getting a complete picture of a founder and of a business, not just the stuff that they’re eager to share, but also all the stuff that maybe they’re not so eager to share. Doug Leone: We met Fred, we gave him the pitch of Sequoia. I remember we had a 10 slide pitch. It talked about all the mistakes we’ve made and all the mistakes we commit our companies we’ll not make again, because we’ve seen those mistakes. I remember Fred took that slide and kept it in his binder. And along the way I asked him, what’s the biggest challenge you have now? He said, keeping our systems up. Our data centers are getting inundated by volume. And I said, I know just the person that can help you.  And he took the name and the card. And I remember that I got a call from Fred a week later. He said, you’ve already helped me more than my existing investors have helped me up to now. And I knew when he said that we had a shot at becoming investors. Roelof Botha: In late 2009, Sequoia led ServiceNow’s $41 million Series D round. ServiceNow gained household name customers like Deutsche Bank, Intel and McDonald’s. The company was on a tear, doubling revenue annually, but the problems with outages that Fred shared with Sequoia in their first meeting were only mounting.  Doug Leone: It was clear to us that the company was being just buried under its own success. The number of customers it was getting was too fast. And it’s probably the only time in my life that I suggested that we slow down growth because I didn’t think the then-management team could absorb the volume of business coming our way. And then Fred, a wonderful founder, you also have a person that’s much happier coding than interfacing with people. And unfortunately, as a Chief Executive Officer, you have to interface with people. He was a visionary, but just left to his own wishes, he’d rather be left in a corner room and code. Finding a new CEO in Frank SlootmanRoelof Botha: ServiceNow was at a crossroads. It needed leadership to get to the next level. Where would it come from? Fred Luddy: After Sequoia made the investment, Doug asks me, Fred, do you want to be the CEO or do you want to be the product guy? Because in our experience, you can do one, but not both. And Fred, we’ll support you in whichever path you want to take, but I don’t think you’ll have the bandwidth to do both. And I took this under advisement and did absolutely nothing. Pat Grady: We did have an idea for a process that we could run to help him figure it out. And so, we brought Fred up to the Bay Area to meet with a bunch of people who were executives or founders of various shapes and sizes. And so, we wanted Fred to hear all of the different sides of the story, and all of the different pros and cons to the various configurations that he could set up for himself. Fred Luddy: It was a fairly exhausting day, for me anyway. They put together all these meetings. We drove all over the Valley.   Pat Grady: And then, that night, Doug and Fred and I go to dinner. And I just remember Fred having this big grin on his face. And we’re like, Fred, what are you grinning about? He’s like, I know exactly what I want to do. We’re like, okay, great. What do you want to do?  Fred Luddy: I looked at Doug and he looked at me and I said, Doug, I don’t have any of the skills that those people have that are CEOs. And furthermore, I have no desire in developing them. I’m your product guy. We need to find a CEO.  Fred Luddy: We went through a really exhaustive search to find somebody. Doug Leone: We went on a mission to find someone that could be his business partner, someone who understood he was coming in as a CEO, but he would have to partner with Fred, not in running the business, but as a business partner, and if that marriage worked, we were going to have a homerun opportunity. Fred Luddy: Doug had a favorite, I had a favorite, we did not have a shared favorite.  Doug Leone: We both didn’t quite have the meeting of the minds. And then, we came across Frank Slootman, who was then a partner, an operating partner at Greylock, and we got wind of the fact that he had known that investing was not for him, and he was looking for a CEO job.  Frank is a doer. Frank is not, you know, all sugar, lollipop and apple pie. Frank is a real deal.  Frank Slootman: When I was first approached by Sequoia, I was slightly incredulous because this was help desk management. It was the most boring business on the planet, right?   My name is Frank Slootman and I was the Chief Executive Officer of ServiceNow. When I started making inquiries and, yeah, everybody kind of replaces that software every three years and eventually, that will just go away.  So, I was getting all these conflicting signals about, wow, is this a hot shit company, or is this something that is incredibly boring and has no real strategic mojo to it? So, the one thing that stuck out, of course, is the company was growing fast. I mean, velocity is the mother’s milk of venture capital, okay. I mean, when you have velocity, you got something. And when you don’t have it, you got nothing. So, when you have velocity, you’re going to start looking closer and go like, what’s going on here? Fred Luddy: I think what intrigued Frank was, first of all, he really didn’t believe how well we were doing financially from a cash flow positive perspective at this age of the company.  Frank Slootman: There’s high growth there. There’s velocity, and there is an incredibly passionate customer base there. So I sort of figured, you know what, I can figure out the rest. I think we got the most important things covered here. Roelof Botha: In 2011, Frank Slootman became CEO of ServiceNow and Fred became Chairman and Chief Product Officer.  Pat Grady: Leadership change is always a crucible moment because you never know what you’re going to get. <> It’s a system full of people. And even the best and most capable and well-intentioned people are still human beings. And when you throw somebody new into the mix, no matter how talented that person is or how much you might respect them, disagreements are going to come up. Organ rejection is a possibility, and there’s a lot of work that you have to do to get the team to gel.  Fred Luddy: The first 90 to 120 days that Frank was CEO was probably the most difficult of my career. I was used to being a benevolent autocrat at the corporation. And now, I had a position where he was in that seat.  Doug Leone: Frank is a do something yesterday kind of person. He doesn’t mess around. Your lead, follow, or get out of the way kind of leader.  Pat Grady: There’s a new sheriff in town moment that does stick out. And that was, the company was based in San Diego, but then it opened a Bay Area office. And they had tickets to one of the San Diego sports teams, but they did not have tickets to any of the Bay Area sports teams. And when Frank found out about this, he said, huh, well, that’s not fair that one office has tickets to go to the games and the other office doesn’t. Get rid of the tickets. And a couple weeks later, he heard that some people had gone to the game, and he went to the person who he’d deputized to get rid of the tickets, and he said, what happened? I thought I told you to get rid of the tickets? And he said, well, people were already signed up for the games and people really liked them, so, we decided we’d just keep them through the end of the season. And Frank said, okay, you don’t work here anymore. And it’s a trivial thing, but the message that he needed to make sure that people heard was, when I ask you to do something, that’s not a request, that’s an order.  Fred Luddy: I remember calling Doug and telling him that I’m not sure that this was the right thing. And his only advice to me was, give it 90 days. And I thought, well, I can do that pretty easily.  Early on, Frank said, well, this is going to be our number one priority. He sent this email out to six or seven people. And I said, well, I disagree. This can’t be our number one priority. Our number one priority should be this. And he calls me and he said, Fred, there can only be one CEO. He said, it’s okay if you don’t want me to be the CEO, but there can only be one CEO. And I said, you know what? You’re absolutely right. There is absolutely one CEO. And that really set the tone for our relationship, in that, if I disagreed with him, and it was something that was, perhaps, where people would get emotional, then he and I discussed it one-on-one. Frank Slootman: We needed him. So, the question was very much, are you going to be here? How long are you going to be here? And there were many reasons we needed him. Because he was a visionary, he was a driver, he was an innovator. And he knew where all the bodies were buried.  There were a lot of reasons why we needed Fred in the worst way. I mean, that was just not an option at all. He had to be there.  Doug Leone: What Frank faced is a company which had more issues than what I understood, maybe anybody understood. Overcoming scaling challengesFrank Slootman: The thing that really scared us, is that we were a cloud application platform at a time when cloud infrastructures didn’t exist. Fred jokingly said, when I joined, he said, oh, when we first got started, we bought a used Dell server on eBay and we stuck it in the closet and that was our cloud. That was the data center or whatever had to, you know, pretend to be a data center. Fred Luddy: Frank realized, far more so than I did, what was going to be necessary to build out the resilient and scalable architecture that we have today.  Frank Slootman: We had customers like General Electric, UBS, Deutsche Bank, the largest institutions in the world who had committed themselves to a ServiceNow strategy.  Fred Luddy: One of the things about our system, which is different from a lot of others, is that our customers can’t take an outage of even several minutes. And by that, I mean several minutes ever.  Frank Slootman: I remember having a conversation early on with the Chief Operating Officer at Deutsche Bank, and he said, you must succeed. He says, we have no way back. And, I’m thinking at the same time, yeah, and we’re running on a Dell server running out of a closet. Many days, we were up and down and sideways. That, after a while, became super intense because we were not growing out of that situation.  I had CIOs from Johnson and Johnson who would just call up and say, what in the hell’s going on over there? We didn’t even understand the problems.  So, people looked at us like, you guys don’t know what you’re doing. And they were not wrong. We did not know what we were doing. Doug Leone: I remember Frank telling me that for the first year he went to sleep terrified of the calls he may get in the middle of the night. Frank Slootman: It was much more existential than, oh, you know, we got some tough challenges on our hands. I didn’t think we were going to live through this. I mean it was one of those things. This is so huge. So enormous. Right? How do you survive this? Right? Because there are no good explanations. There are no reasonable stories to be told. This is just insanity.  Roelof Botha: Facing potential collapse, ServiceNow needed to figure out how to build a reliable cloud network. Frank Slootman: We started to enlist all kinds of different people, different resources. Everybody had an opinion. Everybody had a recommendation. But it was a discipline that was not understood or developed at the time. We went down this path and we had multiple false starts where we said, this is not going to work. And we had to part ways with people several times. We were like looking for water in the desert. It turns out that, in the end, our VP of Engineering that was part of the incoming team, Dan McGee, was an incredibly strong, process-and-discipline guy and he really figured out how to homogenize the infrastructure, meaning that everybody ran on exactly the same software stack.  So, homogenizing, making everything absolutely the same in terms of patch levels, service levels, all these different things, that process started to really freeze out a lot of these problems. They were just completely cookie cutter in the end, and that helped us really get over this chaos and mayhem that we experienced in the early days. It went from being the absolute worst to being one of the best in the industry and also incredibly economically viable as well. Our gross margins became very, very strong. Roelof Botha: Among the other issues Frank faced were unworkable contracts with customers that had to be rewritten, a lack of patents for its intellectual property that put the company in danger of catastrophic lawsuits, and the need for more talent to fill out every department, from sales to research and development.  Frank Slootman: I’ve been in companies that were dramatically overspent and overstaffed and this one was the exact opposite. It was the scariest of scariest experiences to see how thin this company was on this technical talent. We massively backed up the truck in terms of hiring. I mean, it was insane the amount of hiring that we did and we actually went into a loss-making position for a couple of quarters… even though the company was massively profitable, but for the wrong reasons. We doubled the size of the entire company in terms of number of employees in a matter of months. And it shocked the Board of Directors. They’re like, you did what? But, in hindsight, I would have gone faster if I could. We would always get up in the morning, one foot in front of the other. We did what we had to do, however difficult and ugly it was, and confrontational it was at times. We kept moving, and in the end, we solved all these problems  They all went away. So, in other words, it can be done. Roelof Botha: In addition to solving some of ServiceNow’s most pressing issues, Frank also led an effort to broaden the company’s product offerings and capitalize on the promise that was inherent in Fred’s initial product design. Frank Slootman: We fairly quickly started to look at evolving our positioning from help desk replacement to what we refer to as the ERP for IT. The idea was that IT would have its own system of record, it would have its own platform where all the functions of IT would be, you have a single database and a fully integrated system. That had never been done, and people looked at us like, what? ERP for IT? What are you talking about? You’re a help desk replacement tool.  Here’s the important thing. Now, everybody in IT is going to be licensed on ServiceNow, not just that small group of help desk management people. We just said, look, if you work on IT, and you don’t have a login to this system, what are you doing here? Obviously, from a business model standpoint, you can now sell 40, 50 times as many licenses to the same customer, because we would go in and say, yeah, we’re not here to license your help desk management staff, which is a very small group of people. We’re here to license everybody, including you, Mr. CIO. But it was only the beginning, because we had other transformations that were coming after that. Pat Grady: There’s no one moment that stands out as the moment where we said, thank goodness, Frank is here. It was almost all of the moments.  Fred Luddy: I have the utmost respect for Frank and I considered it to be an honor to work for him, and I learned a lot from Frank and I’m very, very appreciative of that relationship that we had. Doug Leone: I remember being at a Board dinner. And Fred and I were talking about how great things had worked out with Frank. And I said, thank God we got Frank, because in my opinion, Fred, we were 90 days from going out of business.  Roelof Botha: With Frank’s cleareyed stewardship and Fred’s visionary product design, ServiceNow was growing from a helpdesk replacement tool to the ERP of IT, and then beyond, to a multi-use tool that was being used across every corner of the enterprise. The company’s success was not going unnoticed. Contemplating an acquisition offerFred Luddy: ServiceNow started getting unsolicited offers for an acquisition. And there were companies large and small, including Dell, and then, we did get an offer from VMware. And that was an exciting thing. Because VMware at the time, 2010, was really just on top of the world. They had a huge market cap. They were really well revered in the technology industry. And then, I flew up to Palo Alto and met with Carl Eschenbach.  Carl: We reached out to ServiceNow. We realized that this could be a very good platform for us to have as an asset, as we continued to build out our management approach to how IT and service management was delivered. My name is Carl Eschenbach. I’m the former President and COO of VMware and I’m currently the CEO of Workday.  We also knew that, at the time, ServiceNow was having some challenges with their platform and technology. Frank Slootman: This is in a time where we were struggling greatly. We don’t know whether we can do this with the level of challenges that we have. So, that’s when you start entertaining these kind of scenarios.  You’re like, the last thing I want to do is fumble this and basically have a train wreck on my hands. Carl: I think we had some of the best engineers in the world and we could help them modernize a product, bring stability to it, and help them scale the technology as well. Doug Leone: One day, I got a call from Frank Slootman saying there’s an offer on the table to buy the company for $2.5 billion. Frank Slootman: Back then, multi billion dollar exits were pretty goddamn rare, so if there’s one being offered, you don’t summarily dismiss that. When you’re a VC, you’re betting on many companies. We only have one.  This is not Peter Pan, okay. This is real life. Fred Luddy: At the time, I was about 55 years old. I’d been bankrupt twice. I had a new child. So, this is a chance to be not bankrupt. I really had my heart set emotionally on being acquired by VMware, and then brought it to the board and said, that’s what I would really like to do, is be acquired. Blocking the saleRoelof Botha: But not everyone was so excited. **Pat Grady:**This offer was the old holiday sneak attack.  My now-wife, then-girlfriend and I, Sarah were in New Zealand and we went for one of these three-day hikes where you’re just kind of off the grid for three days. And we come back in from this three-day hike and I’d had no cell phone reception, no email service… for the first time since joining Sequoia. And so, I was already a little bit nervous about what might’ve happened while I was off the grid.  And so, as this flood of emails comes back into my inbox, I see one from Doug where the subject line says in all caps, WHERE ARE YOU PLEASE? And then the body of the email was just, CALL ME. Doug Leone: And I asked him to put together a presentation that we’re giving it away for $2.5 billion. We created 10 slides and we sent it to Fred and Frank.  Fred Luddy: Mr. Leone always says very nice things, but he’s also very unambiguous at times. And he said, Fred, you’re getting screwed. And I thought, well, if this is getting screwed, I might learn to like it.   And he said, I cannot in any way support this. Doug was the one, he said, Fred, you’re going to be a 10 Bagger. What’s a 10 Bagger? He goes, you’re gonna be worth 10 billion dollars, why are you selling for 1 billion dollars? Roelof Botha: You have a CEO and a Founder who want to sell the company and investors who want to prevent this at all costs. ServiceNow was at a crossroads that would have an enormous impact on the company’s fate. Doug Leone: I’m on vacation in Hawaii, and for seven days, my family saw me pacing back and forth with a flip phone in my ear.  Pat Grady: We were in a situation where we had no leverage whatsoever. Doug Leone: We bought common shares from Fred. We had no voting rights. In fact, we had no rights as Board members. We can voice our opinion, but that’s where it began and ended. And so, I tried very hard to find a way, during a Christmas holiday, to stop this sale.  Fred Luddy: It’s right around December 22nd, 23rd. And I had taken my son for a walk down the horse trail next to our house, and he’s holding on to my little finger, he’s in his onesie with his footie pajamas, and I get a call, and it’s Doug Leone. He goes, Fred, do you want us to write you a check for a hundred million dollars?  Pat Grady: Doug said, well, I will personally buy the shares of anybody who wants to sell at this price. And people thought that was a nice sort of show, but that also didn’t necessarily end the conversation because people were still inclined to go after the offer. Fred Luddy: Again, this is like a couple days before Christmas, and I’m like, no, I’m good. I’m good.  Doug Leone: I remember calling Steve Bochner, who was then, I believe, the CEO of Wilson Sonsini. I told Steve, Steve, they want to take an offer. And Steve told me, well, no, they can’t take an offer. They have a fiduciary duty to shop the company around for a maximum type of valuation. And so, I call a Board meeting. I said, we have to shop the company around. And the then-lawyer of ServiceNow, the outside counsel, said, Doug, only public companies have to be shopped around. I go, shoot, I got bad advice. So, we ended the Board meeting. I call Steve Bochner again. Steve, they’re telling me that only public companies have to be shopped around. He said, no, no. Private companies also have to be shopped around. I said, well, how am I going to argue this? He’s going to say public, I say private. I need something more.  And this is where one of those breaks of a lifetime happens. And so, Steve said, we happen to have hired at Wilson Sonsini as one of our partners, the Honorable Bill Chandler in our Washington, D. C. office, who actually wrote the law that private companies must be shopped around as well. I go, wow, can we get Bill Chandler on the phone?  So Steve, Bill Chandler, and I talked, and he confirmed everything that Steve Bochner said. I asked Bill whether he’d be available for a phone call during a Board meeting. And I called yet another Board meeting. It might have been the 23rd of December now. Doug, are you thick? You know, I got a little abused. Aren’t you listening? Only public companies need to be shopped around. And I said, well, I just happen to have, on standby, the Honorable Bill Chandler in Washington, who actually wrote the law.  I got him on the phone. And he explained very clearly that it’s not just public companies, but private companies also. The Board and the attorney were stunned. I asked if there were any questions of Bill. There were no questions and right after I put down the phone, I said, who’s going to call Larry Ellison? And there was silence in the room, and I knew that then and there, I killed the M&A transaction. Fred Luddy: I was hyper disappointed that we were going to make up our minds not to sell to VMware, but in the back of my mind, I knew that it was the right thing to do.  Carl: I thought it was a tremendous, if you will, jujitsu move by Doug and the Sequoia team. They knew the market they were selling into was ripe for disruption. They knew it was a very big market opportunity. The total addressable market at the time was quite large.  I think it was super unique and I can’t recall over my career now spanning almost 37 years that this has actually happened. Doug Leone: It’s once in ten careers stories like this happen. Roelof Botha: Just a few months later, in June of 2012, ServiceNow celebrated its IPO. After Fred, Frank, and other members of the management team rang the bell at the New York Stock Exchange, the company’s value soared 29 percent. By the end of that year, the company’s market cap was $3.7 billion, over a billion dollars more than VMWare’s offer. Two years later, Doug’s 10 Bagger prediction came true: ServiceNow reached a market value of $10 billion. Fred Luddy: I’m glad that he was right about the 10 Bagger, which is almost one 10th of what we’re valued at now. Lessons learnedPat Grady: Selling the company to VMware versus living as a public company with 150 billion in market cap, and perhaps living as the canonical example of performance at scale as the enterprise company that all other companies admire and look up to and hope to someday be like, that’s a pretty big difference. Doug Leone: I would advise companies that receive an acquisition… do not get charmed by a number that seems like a big number, or a number that some model says is pay two year forward. Don’t get charmed by that. The only question that matters is, what can this company be five years from now, seven years from now, ten years from now? That is the question. How big is your ambition? And let it ride. Roelof Botha: Today ServiceNow is a one-stop shop for CIOs, making work simpler for over 7,700 companies.   Pat Grady: There is quite literally no other software company at their scale putting up the sort of numbers that they’re putting up.  Doug Leone: It’s a behemoth. It’s a respected giant in the software industry. Frank Slootman: When I walked in versus what it is today, it’s mind-blowing. We were 250 people at the time, we were doing not even 100 million in sales. It’s doing 10 billion, and still have a lot of fuel in the tank to drive the growth of the company. Sometimes it’s nice to hear a story like this because it’s like, yeah, you had the worst terror known to man and yet here’s where we are today. So, it’s not just wishful thinking. These things do really happen. So, keep the faith. Pat Grady: Fred Luddy nailed the product. Here is a guy who dropped out of high school to work as a programmer and in his early to mid-fifties, having had literal decades of experience in this market, decided that he could probably do it better than he’d done it before. And he absolutely nailed it.  Fred Luddy: Technology that’s going to last a long time requires extreme simplicity and extreme modularity. But I think it’s probably really the corporate culture that has let the company grow through now four different CEOs and branch out into the market expanse that it has. So, our corporate culture was always—Operate with great integrity. Be very honest about our capabilities. Be forthright about any shortcomings. Take accountability for when we have made mistakes. And I think that, because of that, our customers have been so willing to work with us in good times and in bad and to help the company grow.  We really do form a partnership with our customers. So, I’m very proud every day to be associated with ServiceNow. I can’t wait for the next 10 or 20 years. Roelof Botha: This has been Crucible Moments, a podcast from Sequoia Capital.  Crucible Moments is produced by the Epic Stories and Vox Creative Podcast Teams, along with Sequoia Capital. Special thanks to Fred Luddy, Frank Slootman, Pat Grady, Doug Leone and Carl Eschenbach for sharing their stories. <div class="framer-mcvrsd" id="

On Training Data, we learn from innovators pushing forward the frontier of AI’s capabilities. Today we’re bringing you something different. It’s the story of a company currently implementing AI at scale in the enterprise, and how it was built from a bootstrapped idea in the pre-AI era to a 150 billion dollar market cap giant.

It’s the Season 2 premiere of Sequoia’s other podcast, Crucible Moments, where we hear from the founders and leaders of some legendary companies about the crossroads and inflection points that shaped their journeys. In this episode, you’ll hear from Fred Luddy and Frank Slootman about building and scaling ServiceNow. Listen to Crucible Moments wherever you get your podcasts or go to:
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/40bWCUSan0boCn0GZJNpPn
Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/crucible-moments/id1705282398

Hosted by: Roelof Botha, Sequoia Capital
Transcript: https://www.sequoiacap.com/podcast/crucible-moments-servicenow/

本集资源与出处